


Terracotta Angel, c.1896
Watts Chapel, England
Photo ©: Jeff Saward/Labyrinthos
Please note, the contents
of this website are
© 2011 Labyrinthos
unless stated otherwise.
Please contact us for permission to reproduce
any text or
images




The Labyrinth as a Printer’s Device
Ivor Winton

Reprinted from Caerdroia 21 -
Caerdroia 17 introduced its readers to the use of the labyrinth figure as a printer’s device in 15th century Italy. Since this byway in the labyrinth’s story has gone almost unnoticed, some brief comments may be in order.
The device or mark in question belonged to Johannes Jacobus de Benedictis (Gian Giacomo
Benedetti), an obscure figure active in Bolognese publishing circles in the years
around 1500. Nothing is known of his life and work save such scraps as may be gleaned
from the books which bear his imprint -
Of particular concern here are the occasional publishing efforts of Johannes de Benedictis
in other cities along the northeastern fringes of the Apennines. Within the space
of a few months in 1495, acting in concert with Paulus Gaurinus of Forli, he introduced
printing first to Cesena (a single book only), then Forli (four titles). Each of
these latter works has the labyrinth figure as a printer’s device. More than a decade
later, de Benedictis returned to Forli to publish the Constitutiones Marchiae Anconitanae
(December 10th, 1507), again in partnership with Guarinus, again with the distinctive
labyrinth trademark.(1) Our last glimpse of him is in Camerino, further down the
peninsula: during 1523-
Against this capsule biography must be juxtaposed another. In December 1495, a second
printer operating in Bologna, Johannes Jacobus de Fontanesis of Reggio, published
a volume of poetry, styling himself in its colophon "Ioanne(s) Iacobu(s) de Fontanetis
de Regio Cognominato de Laberintis." De Fontanesis, in other words, had adopted the
labyrinth as sobriquet! Subsequently he too would employ a labyrinth figure as device
in at least one publication. The parallel with de Benedictis is striking; so striking,
that researchers have long wondered whether these two individuals were actually one
and the same. Proponents of this view can point beyond the coincidence of iconography
to a common association with the de Benedictis firm and demonstrable typographical
links. Less familiar perhaps is the fact that a now extremely rare document, the
Bulla indulta ac privilegia concessa civitati forliviensi, was published by Johannes
Jacobus de Fortanesis and Paulus Gaurinus at Forli on January 1st, 1508 -
Now to the labyrinth device itself; or devices, if you will, since the basic design
underwent minor modifications over the years. It's earliest form (1495) presents
a circular figure, characteristically medieval in plan, with a conspicuous blank
centre (figure 1). Above, on an arching base line, stands a large cross of the patriarchal
type dear to early printers. An inscription reads "PG IIB / C O." While the first
line clearly acknowledges Gaurinus and de Benedictis, just what the letters "C O"
intend is problematical. They have been thought a reference to Camerino, but nearly
two decades would pass before de Benedictis practised his trade there; that they
signify cognominato in allusion to the labyrinth figure seems more promising.(3)
A later form of the device appears in the edition of Constitutiones published in
1507 (figure 2).(4) Although fundamentally the same, the labyrinth has been drawn
with less care here and with a much smaller centre. Also reduced in size is the accompanying
cross. For its part, the inscription now runs "PG Io.I. /C O," as if de Benedictis
had judged his surname dispensable. The device used at Camerino in 1523-
Unfortunately, I have not seen the labyrinth mark adopted by de Fontanesis in at
least one publication. Described as a "close copy" of de Benedictis’ 1495 design,
it comprised "a maze (i.e., a labyrinth) with the printer's Christian names and the
letter R ('Regiensis').(5) An earlier device favoured by de Fortanesis had carried
the inscription "Joa-
On motivation there is little to say. Precisely why de Benedictis should have turned
to the labyrinth symbol for a printer's mark -
Ivor Winton, Minneapolis, U.S.A.; July 1987
REFERENCES:
1. To which attention was drawn in Caerdroia 17, p.30.
2. This argument added by Norton, p.36.
3. Camerino thesis: Kristeller, p.20. Cognominato thesis: British Museum, 7:1120.
4. Illustrated in Caerdroia 17, p.30.
5. British Museum, 6:838.
6. Haebler, 2:10.
7. Vaccaro, p.105, if I read her correctly, supposes some connection to Neoplatonic doctrines. She offers not a shred of evidence.
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY AND WORKS CITED:
British Museum. Catalogue of Books Printed in the XVth Century Now in the British
Museum, 10 vols. London: British Museum, 1908-
Caerdroia 17 (1985), p.30.
Cioni, A. In Dizionario biografico degll Italianl, 1964. S.v."Benedetti, Giovan Giacomo."
Fumagalli, G. Lexicon Typographicum Italiae: Dictionnaire géographique d'Italie pour servir à l'histoire de l'imprimerie dans ce pays. Florence: Leo S.Olschki, 1905.
Fumagalli, G. Giunte e correzione al Lexicon Typographicum Italiae: Dictionnaire géographique d'Italle pour servir à l'histoire de I'imprimerie dans ce pays. Florence: Leo S.Olschki, 1905. Florence: Leo S.Olschki, 1939.
Haebler, K. Typenrepertorium der Wlegendrucke. 4 vols. in 5. Halle, etc.: Rudolf
Haupt, 1905-
Kristeller, P. Die itallenischen Buchdrucker and Verlegerzeichen bis 1525. Strasbourg: J.H.E.Heitz (Heltz & Mundel), 1893.
Norton, F.J. Italian Printers, 1501-
Sander, M. Le livre A figures itallen depuls 1467 jusqu'à 1530. 6 vols. New York: G. E. Stechert, 1941.
Servolini, L. “Gil antichi tipografl forlivesi.” Gutenberg Jahrbuch 15 (1940): 255-
Vaccaro, E. Le marche del tipografi ed editori italiani del secolo XVI nella Biblioteca angelica di Roma. Florence: Leo S.Olschki, 1983.



Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
